UNDP
- GEF Small Grants Programme India
An Overview
India
is one among the eighty-three countries globally, which operates
the GEF Small Grants Programme (SGP) administered by
the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). SGP India became operational in September
1997. After the Pilot Phase and Operational Phase I and II, now
the SGP is in its third operational phase (2005-2008).
Overall
responsibility of SGP in India rests with the
National Steering Committee (NSC), which comprises
representatives from the Government of India, UNDP,
NGOs and academicians. The programme is being
implemented (since September 2000) by the National
Host Institution � Centre for Environment Education
(CEE).
The
SGP in India has the following objectives:
-
Promotes innovative local responses that reduces threats to the global environment in
one or more of the five thematic areas � biodiversity
conservation, climate change mitigation, protection of international
waters, prevention of land degradation and phasing out of
persistent organic
pollutants (POPs).
-
Builds capacities of experts, self and communities on issues
and concerns for sustainable local initiatives.
-
Demonstrates the effectiveness and potential
for wider application of small-scale,
decentralized,
community based initiatives leading to local entrepreneurships;
- Generate
learning's from the community based
initiatives and support the spread of successful
approaches and methodologies;
- Creating
public awareness and advocacy on global environmental
issues.
The
potential courses of action that could be supported
under operational phase III will include actions
that could be taken to ameliorate the threat and
to ensure that the biodiversity/ international
water body/natural resource or energy base of
global significance be conserved or rehabilitated
or, in the case of energy, reduced to sustainable
levels of use and management. This step helps
to identify
a SGP intervention that would deal with the threat
and contribute to eliminating it. 'A carefully
thought-out project concept or proposal, by following
this reasoning, makes explicit the link between
the proposed intervention and potential global
environmental benefit, by focusing on benefits
in the GEF focal areas, which meet both global
conventions and local objectives.' The SGP will
also identify proactively project themes, which
CBOs/NGOs can consider when they develop their
own project concepts/proposals and ideas.
Monitoring
and Evaluation
The
SGP-India views monitoring and evaluation as an ongoing
participatory process, which enables enhancement of skills,
understanding and applying lessons
learned from the projects� experiences. SGP-India
has, from the beginning, insisted to project partners
to incorporate clearly defined
indicators of performance in all projects.
This is a way of promoting learning among the involved
and getting their views on the progress of the project.
Participatory monitoring and evaluation involves stakeholders
and beneficiaries in the collective examination and assessment of
a project. Moreover it is people centered: Project stakeholders
and beneficiaries are the key actors of the evaluation process
and not merely 'objects' of the evaluation.
Stakeholders are groups that have a role and interest
in the objectives and implementations of a project |
The SGP provides a flexible window to meet the
unforeseen
circumstances and time extensions which are possible to happen
in projects. The NGO's and CBO's as implementing partner therefore
need to be led by more genuine concern on a 'process driven approach'
rather than a targeted way of working, leading to better empowerment
at the grassroots level. |
All project proposals will also be required to present a �Risk Analysis� stating
the critical assumptions and external factors
upon which the achievement of project objective
depends.
Each field project partner whose project is approved and functioning is required to submit Quarterly
Progress Reports (QPR). These QPRs will also identify
any assistance needed by project partners in the
form of technical, social, financial or other
inputs that were not foreseen at the time of preparing
the project report. The National Coordinators (NC) and
Regional Coordinators (RC) will, to the
extent possible, arrange for provision of these
inputs and provide advice on any mid-course corrections
needed.
|